Pokemon Could Be Your Biggest Marketing Opportunity

Written on 13 Jul 2016

Pokemon Go hasn’t landed in the UK yet, but when it does there’s little doubt in my mind that we’ll see the same phenomenon as other countries: people tripping over each other, stumbling across roads and scrambling to catch different Pokemon in Augmented Reality.

However for retailers, it could lead to another kind of phenomenon: incredible new footfall and customer capture.

It’s already been semi-confirmed in a Financial Times Article that this ingenious game will generate absurd amounts of revenue through sponsored places:

Alongside in-app payments, “there is a second component to our business model at Niantic, which is this concept of sponsored locations”, Mr Hanke said, where companies “pay us to be locations within the virtual game board — the premise being that it is an inducement that drives foot traffic”.

I find it mindblowingly incredible (I am in awe) that one of the most potentially lucrative marketing opportunities for brick and mortar retailers will be to have an augmented reality cartoon character tucked under their best selling products, with the hope that hordes of potential customers traipse into their shop to snag a Pokemon.

Certainly they won’t be the most relevantly engaged customer base, but given the furious passion and commitment people have already shown for the game, it’s worth a shot, right?

I’m by no means an expert on Pokemon, but it is surely only a matter of time before the 729 Pokemon characters are joined by “Tescomoth”, “Poundlandpoke” and “M&SWhirl” (this isn’t just any Pokemon character…)

Understanding the Contactless Limit Rise

Written on 04 Sep 2015

September 2015 heralded more than the slow descent to Autumn and Winter; there was a big announcement regarding a change to UK contactless limits.

This announcement was muddled in with the UK launch of Apple Pay back in July, and Apple were very keen to work with retailers who would be able to commit to a higher value contactless limits to bolster the Apple Pay in-shop experience.

General - and even retail - press have been highlighting the contactless limit is going up to £30 per transaction.

What doesn’t seem to be getting much coverage is that the contactless limits are now up to the retailer to decide. In order to take advantage of the new £30 - let’s call it a “new safe limit” - retailers need to update their card machine software (which is rarely a straightforward feature).

Any mid to large retailer is actually now in a position to define their own limits. It’s likely that £30 is being forced through for smaller retailers who aren’t in a position to a direct customer relationship with their card machine provider, but those with closer ties can set the limit to whatever they want.

Payment processors are demonstrating an increased confidence in contactless payments (or prepared to underwrite a bigger risk), so it’s hard to understand the limit only moving to £30; how many more transactions will really covered by the extra £10? It seems hardly worth the fuss unless you’re going to introduce a step change in acceptance such as paying for your weekly shop, a family meal or retail-therapy-satisfying splurge.

I suspect the bigger challenge here is consumer confidence in contactless on larger transactions, and also how you reliably communicate with the UK population that the limit has gone up. That said, Visa’s new mandate that all cards issued from December 2016 must be contactless seems to be at odds with lower confidence.

The best text expander for OS X

Written on 02 Jul 2013

After a short stint in Windows, made easier by AutoHotKey text expansion, I am firmly back in the land of Mac. I naturally jumped in to TextExpander but at $34.95 it was a struggle to justify it long term for lightweight text-expansion-only use.

So I hit the App Store.

After a brief stint with "Smart Typer" (subsequently refunded by Apple due to it being grossly incapable and buggy, I found aText.

aText accelerates your typing by replacing abbreviations with frequently used phrases you define.

It works perfectly, all for the modestly affordable price tag of $5. You can save yourself a lot of trial and error if you're looking for straightforward OS X text expansion and go straight to aText.

Redis, Heroku and the Business Benefit of Free Tiers

Written on 05 Apr 2013

There are currently 5 different Redis add-ons available on the Heroku platform.

Redis To Go, Redis Cloud, openredis, MyRedis and RedisGreen

Which do you choose?  I imagine there's a fairly long tail of Heroku apps that use one of the free Redis tiers offered by the providers that have one, but there must also be (me included) a pool of developers who want to develop and test on a single Heroku instance using a free tier, and then ramp everything up to a billable level once they go live.

For me the decision was based on who gives you the most for free.  

Whilst I have no experience in running a hosted Redis service and what impact free tiers have on profitability, it seems unlikely that when faced with 5 options a developer is going to go for one they can't try for free.  That would rule out openredis and RedisGreen straight away (chepeast tier $10 and $169 per month, respectively).

With the remaining 3 options you will be left to compare and contrast simultaneous connections and database size.  MyRedis gives you 5Mb and 3 connections, which knock them out of the race.

So then you're left with RedisCloud and Redis To Go.  Both have the same number of simulatenous connections (10) which leaves RedisCloud as our winner because they give you a 20Mb instance over 10Mb.

Does this make logical sense?  Perhaps not, but I can't be the only one who has gone through this thought process.  It might make more sense to look at the higher tiers which will match your intended capacity, but there's a great opportunity to get customers in by offering a good quality free tier.

When I went live and ramped up, did I research the next tier up?  Nope, just hit upgrade on my RedisCloud free tier.


HTML Form Multiple Submit Buttons, Different Actions

Written on 28 Mar 2013

I've often wondered as to the best way of having two form buttons that can submit but yield slightly different actions.  Turns out HTML5 scratches that itch with the `formaction` attribute.

The formaction attribute specifies the URL of a file that will process the input control when the form is submitted.

In my case, it's going to the same (Sinatra) controller action route, but by appending a simple URL parameter (`?action=this`) you can modify the response/control to change behaviour accordingly.


Check it out on W3Schools

Copyright © 2006 - 2019 Kester Dobson